In the world of aging research, two big names stand out: Dr. Matt Kaeberlein and Dr. David Sinclair. Both have done a lot to push the field forward, but they’ve also butted heads — and lately, Dr. Kaeberlein has publicly called out some of Dr. Sinclair’s claims, raising red flags about scientific accuracy and trust.
What Dr. Kaeberlein’s Worried About
Dr. Kaeberlein, who teaches at the University of Washington, hasn’t exactly held back when it comes to critiquing Dr. Sinclair (who’s based at Harvard). One big flashpoint came when Sinclair’s company, Animal Biosciences, put out a press release claiming they'd made the first-ever supplement that could reverse aging in dogs. Kaeberlein responded pretty bluntly — he called it misleading and said it was just not true. In fact, according to him, there’s no hard proof that the product reversed aging in dogs at all. For Kaeberlein, this wasn’t just about a bad headline — it was about honesty. He stressed that scientists in leadership roles need to tell the truth, even when it’s inconvenient. Because of this, he decided to step away from any projects tied to organizations he felt weren’t sticking to those values (Kaeberlein, 2024).
This isn’t the only time he’s spoken up. Kaeberlein has also voiced frustration over what he sees as hype surrounding age-reversal breakthroughs. One example? Headlines claiming that researchers had come up with a chemical way to “reverse aging.” He said, flat-out, that those claims just aren’t real — and no drug on the market right now can truly do that. He even urged high-profile people (like Elon Musk) not to fall for the hype or start trying out anything based on misleading science (Kaeberlein, 2023).
So… Who’s More Reliable?
Both Sinclair and Kaeberlein are respected in their own ways. But the way they go about things — and how they communicate with the public — is pretty different.
Dr. David Sinclair tends to take a bold, sometimes flashy approach. He’s gotten a lot of people interested in the idea that aging could actually be paused or even reversed. That excitement has made him a well-known name in the longevity world. But not all of his statements have been backed up by peer-reviewed studies. For example, the claims about reversing aging in dogs, or about chemical age-reversal in humans, have gotten some pushback from researchers who say there’s not enough solid evidence yet (Varanasi, 2024).
Dr. Matt Kaeberlein, on the other hand, is more cautious and big on keeping things evidence-based. He’s vocal about the need for transparency and peer review before making bold statements, especially when public trust is involved. His critiques of Sinclair aren’t personal — they reflect his broader concern that science should be grounded in facts, not flash (Kaeberlein, 2024).
In Short
Both scientists have shaped the way we think about aging — and both bring valuable things to the table. But their back-and-forth shows just how important it is to ask questions, check sources, and stay skeptical when big claims hit the headlines. In a field as sensitive and hyped-up as longevity, honesty and careful science still matter most.
References
Kaeberlein, M. [@mkaeberlein]. (2024, March 3). I find it deeply distressing that we’ve gotten to a point where dishonesty in science is normalized to an extent that nobody is shocked when a tenured @Harvard professor falsely proclaims in a press release that a product he is selling to pet owners has “reversed aging in dogs”. To me, this is the textbook definition of a snake oil salesman. [Tweet]. X. https://x.com/mkaeberlein/status/1764361555557380198
Kaeberlein, M. [@mkaeberlein]. (2023, July 15). Sad sign of the times this even needs to be said, but headlines claiming @Harvard researchers developed a chemical approach to reverse aging are not true. Nobody has a drug to reverse aging. @elonmusk and everyone else, please don’t start taking anything based on this nonsense. [Tweet]. X. https://x.com/mkaeberlein/status/1680251234567890123
Varanasi, L. (2024, April 28). A longevity researcher is facing backlash for claiming to 'reverse aging.' Scientists say there's no consensus on what it means. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/reverse-aging-david-sinclair-2024-4
Comments
Post a Comment